Home Table of Contents Treatise Search

Sign up for Legal
Apps Newsletter


Garland's Digest on Employment Discrimination Law
online since 1997
 

 


 


Disclaimer: The case on which this summary is based may no longer be current law. Also, if the case was decided on summary judgment, the court recited the "facts" in the light most favorable to the non-movant, which may not be the true facts.

-------------------------

Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips, 173 F.3d 933 (4th Cir. April 8, 1999)

Keywords: Arbitration agreement (unenforceable)

Introduction: Hooters filed suit against Annette Phillips seeking to compel her to pursue her sexual harassment claim in arbitration. The district court refused to compel arbitration. The Fourth Circuit affirms.

Facts: Phillips, a bartender at a Hooters restaurant in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, quit after a Hooters official allegedly sexually harassed her. Prior to quitting, she had signed an arbitration agreement which applied to any Title VII claims. But she was not provided a copy of the rules and procedures for arbitration promulgated by Hooters.

Law:

  1. The rules and procedures for arbitration promulgated by Hooters are so one-sided as to render the agreement to arbitrate unenforceable.

  2. Click here to see actual case.

 

 



 

 


Is this case in our Treatise?

Coming Soon!
 

 


 
Treatise Search Contact Us Privacy

© 2013 Garland's Digest

Apple, the Apple logo, iPad, iPhone, iTouch, and iTunes are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.