Home Table of Contents Treatise Search

Sign up for Legal
Apps Newsletter


Garland's Digest on Employment Discrimination Law
online since 1997
 

 


 


Disclaimer: The case on which this summary is based may no longer be current law. Also, if the case was decided on summary judgment, the court recited the "facts" in the light most favorable to the non-movant, which may not be the true facts.

-------------------------

Brown v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc., 183 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. July 13, 1999)

Keywords: Arbitration agreement (unenforceable)

Introduction: Jerome Brown sued ABF under the ADA. The district court ordered Brown to submit his claim to binding arbitration. The Fourth Circuit reverses.

Facts: Article 37 of the CBA between the union and the employer stated that they both agree not to discriminate. It also stated that this Article covers employees with a qualified disability under the ADA.

Law:

  1. A union-negotiated waiver of employees' right to a federal judicial forum for statutory employment-discrimination claims must be clear and unmistakable. See, Wright v. Universal Maritime Serv. Corp., 525 U.S. 70, 119 S.Ct. 391 (November 16, 1998).

  2. The Fourth Circuit holds that this standard can be met in one of two ways:

    1. The drafting of an explicit arbitration clause which addresses statutory employment-discrimination claims.

    2. If the arbitration clause is not so clear, employees might still be bound if another provision in the CBA makes it unmistakably clear that the CBA applies to the discrimination statute in question.

  3. The Fourth Circuit holds that the CBA in question does not satisfy either test. Therefore, Brown can proceed with his lawsuit.

  4. Click here to see actual case.

 

 



 

 


Is this case in our Treatise?

Coming Soon!
 

 


 
Treatise Search Contact Us Privacy

© 2013 Garland's Digest

Apple, the Apple logo, iPad, iPhone, iTouch, and iTunes are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.