Home Table of Contents Treatise Search

Sign up for Legal
Apps Newsletter


Garland's Digest on Employment Discrimination Law
online since 1997
 

 


 


Disclaimer: The case on which this summary is based may no longer be current law. Also, if the case was decided on summary judgment, the court recited the "facts" in the light most favorable to the non-movant, which may not be the true facts.

-------------------------

Denial of pay raise constitutes ultimate employment decision.

Fierros v. Texas Dept. of Health, 274 F.3d 187 (5th Cir. November 21, 2001) - This is a Title VII retaliation action. The district court granted summary judgment on behalf of the Department. The Fifth Circuit reverses and remands. Salome Fierros filed an administrative complaint alleging that a supervisor, Douglas Arnold, was subjecting her to discrimination based on national origin and gender. Seven months later, Arnold denied Fierros a merit pay raise of $57 per month that had been recommended by Fierros's immediate supervisor. On appeal, the two issues are whether Fierros was subjected to an adverse employment action and whether there was sufficient evidence of a causal link. In order to constitute an adverse employment action, the action must constitute an ultimate employment decision. The Court holds that the denial of a pay raise is an ultimate employment decision. With respect to the issue of a causal link, Fierros presented direct evidence that Arnold told her that she was denied the pay raise because she complained of discrimination. Click here to see actual case.

 

 



 

 


Is this case in our Treatise?

Coming Soon!
 

 


 
Treatise Search Contact Us Privacy

© 2013 Garland's Digest

Apple, the Apple logo, iPad, iPhone, iTouch, and iTunes are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.