Table
of Contents
Treatise Search Age
Discrimination
Disability Discrimination Family and
Medical Leave

Need pdf viewer for iPad?
Visit iTunes for:
iAnnotate PDF


Garland's Digest
on employment discrimination law
online since 1997

 

National Origin Discrimination Pregnancy Discrimination Race
Discrimination
Religious
Discrimination
Sex
Discrimination
Sexual
Harassment

 

 

 

Disclaimer: The case on which this summary is based may no longer be current law. Also, if the case was decided on summary judgment, the court recited the "facts" in the light most favorable to the non-movant, which may not be the true facts.

-------------------------

Under the FMLA, parent cannot take family leave for an adult child unless that child has a physical or mental disability as defined by the ADA. Also, grandparent cannot take family leave for a grandchild.

Novak v. MetroHealth Medical Center, 503 F.3d 572 (6th Cir. September 28, 2007)

Facts: This is a Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") action. MetroHealth has a no fault attendance policy. FMLA leave is not counted as an unexcused absence. An employee accruing 112 points under the policy during any rolling twelve month period is subject to termination.

Donna Novak accrued 124 points between April 16, 2003 and April 16, 2004. The question presented is whether leave she took in late March should have been counted as FMLA leave. On March 22, she reported that her eighteen-year-old daughter was having a baby. On March 23, she arrived late for work without explanation. On March 24, she could not work due to "back pain." On March 25, she reported that her "back was out." On Saturday March 26, she e-mailed her supervisor that she need to be off on emergency leave from March 29 to Thursday April 1 because her daughter was suffering from postpartum depression and her new grandchild had been readmitted to MetroHealth.

With respect to Novak's back problems, she provided a medical certification from Dr. Wloszek, but he did not fill out the part related to her recent medical problem because he had not seen her since October 2003. When MetroHealth advised Novak that the certification was incomplete, she called Dr. Wloszek's office and insisted that his assistant complete the rest of the form. The assistant did so without the doctor's permission. At a pre-discharge meeting, MetroHealth questioned the authenticity of the medical certification form. MetroHealth gave Novak another week to submit medical certification forms. MetroHealth contacted Dr. Wloszek (based on a medical release provided by Novak) and Dr. Wloszek informed MetroHealth that he had not seen Novak since October 2003, lacked personal knowledge of her March 2004 back problems, and did not complete the medical certification form. A few days later, Novak asked Dr. Wloszek to complete the medical certification form. He did so, but he advised MetroHealth that he completed the form based on information provided to him from Novak.

MetroHealth determined that she was not entitled to FMLA leave and she was terminated.

District court: The district court granted summary judgment for MetroHealth.

Appeal: With respect to Novak's back problems, Novak argues that MetroHealth should have advised her of the deficiencies in Dr. Wloszek's medical certification and allowed her a reasonable opportunity to correct them. If that duty was triggered here, the court finds that MetroHealth satisfied that duty by informing her that the certification was deficient and giving her a week to cure the deficiency.

Next, Novak argues that if MetroHealth was dissatisfied with Dr. Wloszek's medical certification that it should have sought a second opinion before denying her leave. The Sixth Circuit disagrees. 29 U.S.C. § 2613(c)(1) states that an employer who has reason to doubt the validity of the employee's certification may require, at the expense of the employer, that the eligible employee obtain the opinion of a second health care provider. This court has previously recognized that this provision of the FMLA is "merely permissive" and does not impose an affirmative duty on an employer. The court notes that other circuits have found that if the employer foregoes its right to a second opinion, it is not thereafter precluded from contesting the validity of the employee's serious health condition.

Next, Novak argues that MetroHealth required her to submit a medical certification from Dr. Wloszek (who had not seen her recently), rather than her new doctor, Dr. Patil. But there is insufficient evidence to support this allegation.

With respect to her claim of denial of family leave, her daughter suffered from postpartum depression for one to two weeks. Under the FMLA, a parent can only take family leave for an adult child if that child has a physical or mental disability as defined by the ADA. Postpartum depression that lasts only one to two weeks does not substantially limit the major life activity of caring for oneself.

Next, the FMLA does not allow a grandparent to take family leave to care for a grandchild.

Finally, the district court dismissed without prejudice some remaining state law claims. This lawsuit was originally removed from state court. The Sixth Circuit holds that where a lawsuit is removed and the district court later declines to take supplemental jurisdiction, the state law claims should be remanded to state court rather than being dismissed without prejudice.

 



 

Table of
Contents
Treatise Who should
advertise?
Contact Us About Us Privacy Policy

© 2010 Garland's Digest