Garland's Digest
on employment discrimination law
online since 1997
Home Table of Contents
Treatise Contents Treatise Index
Search Legal Links


Disclaimer: The case on which this summary is based may no longer be current law. Also, if the case was decided on summary judgment, the court recited the "facts" in the light most favorable to the non-movant, which may not be the true facts.

-------------------------

Same actor inference entitles employer to summary judgment.

Coghlan v. American Seafoods Co. LLC, 413 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. July 7, 2005) - This is a Title VII national origin discrimination action alleging wrongful demotion. Because the person who demoted James Coghlan is the same person who had previously taken favorable employment actions on Coghlan's behalf, the Court addresses the same actor inference. The Court explains that the same actor inference creates a strong inference that there was no discriminatory action. The Court reviews Coghlan's evidence of pretext and holds that that evidence is not sufficient to rebut the same actor inference. Therefore, the employer is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Click here to see actual case.

 

 



Table of Contents Search Contact Us Privacy

© 2005 Garland's Digest

Apple, the Apple logo, iPad, iPhone, iTouch, and iTunes are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.